cyberjournal.org/newslog/show_archives/13 Nov 2004


When articles come across my desk that particularly catch my interest, I post them to newslog. Some of these articles provide real information, others are examples of matrix propaganda, and some are in between. One must always consider the source when evaluating articles, but much can be learned by listening to those with whom we disagree or even whom we mistrust.
—rkm



weekend dialog...

From: richard-at-cyberjournal.org

Date: 13 Nov 2004

Subject: weekend dialog...

To: cj-at-cyberjournal.org, renaissance-network-at-cyberjournal.org

Cc: newslog-at-cyberjournal.org

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------

MSNBC Vote Fraud Video (Must See)

http://www.truthout.org/multimedia.htm

http://websrvr20.audiovideoweb.com/avwebdswebsrvr2143/news_video/5.countdown_56k.mov

 

--------------------------------------------------------

http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1014

 

LA Indymedia (Video ) November 10

 

2 Tanks at L.A. Westwood Anti-Occupation Demonstration

 

November 9, 2004 - At 7:50 PM armored tanks showed up at an

anti-war protest in front of the federal building in Westwood.

 

The tanks circled the block twice, the second time parking

themselves in the street and directly in front of the area

where most of the protesters were gathered...

 

Enraged, some of the people attempted to block the tanks, but

police quickly cleared the street.

 

The people continued to protest the presence of the tanks, but

after about ten minutes the tanks drove off. It is unclear as

to why the tanks were deployed to this location.

 

-------------

 

Friends,

 

I think it is clear that the purpose of the tanks was to 'send a message' to us: "Be warned, the NWO fascist takeover is now complete."

 

There are pictures at the URL above.

 

rkm

 

--------------------------------------------------------

From: Jim MacGregor

Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:35:24 EST

Subject: Re: dialog re: recent postings.  from jim macgregor

To: cj-at-cyberjournal.org

 

Dear Richard

 

As a newcomer I found the recent postings fascinating,

refreshing and uplifting. The dialogue has lightened my almost

overwhelming despair for the future of mankind and this

beautiful planet.  It has  shown me the flicker of a candle

flame which I earnestly hope can ignite your "dry grass fire".

  This is the first time ever that I have taken part in

dialogue over the internet and am absolutely thrilled to bits

at being able to join so many kindred spirits.

 

I am not well read or versed here (my background is in family

medicine)  and I struggle to understand some of the debate,

concepts and philosophical points.  While some of it goes over

my head,  I guess I am par for the course of Joe Public and  I

do hope I can be of some future help in providing fairly

representative feedback.  From what I have read over the

years, I can see that the neo-cons are  taking America and the

rest of the world back to another dark age - if not total

oblivion.

I have not yet read your new book but will certainly do so

soon.  You respond to Nick's comments about the book and

question whether you should include an extended Escaping The

Matrix.  It may be inappropriate for me to comment without

knowing the book, but I can comment on your matrix essay.  For

years I  struggled to comprehend what the hell was going on

in this world.  I could clearly see evil at work and read more

and more in an attempt to understand it.  I was reading stuff

in books and the web but completely unsure if it was true or

not as some of it seemed completely off the wall eg. Nazi

Germany keeping it's war machine on the move with fuel provide

by the US.  My father fought those fascists and suffered

terribly as a result and I simply could not believe that this

could be true.

 

By complete chance, I came across Escaping The Matrix on the

internet and it provided the most profound yet simple

explanation to virtually everything that had puzzled me.  I

now consider that my eureka moment.  I believe that without an

understanding of  your matrix metaphor, it is almost

impossible for ordinary Joe Public to even begin to comprehend

what is going on.  An example is Jeff Kieffer's comments about

Kerry possibly being in league with the stolen election:  It

is almost impossible to comprehend the sanity of Jeff's

question without appreciating the matrix.  If, before I had

understood it,  Jeff suggested to me that  Kerry might

actually have connived to throw the election, I would have

considered him a basket case.   Having read Escaping The

Matrix just a few weeks ago, I did ask myself the very same

question. Is it really beyond the bounds of credibility?    As my friend John O'Dowd told me, "It is as if you have slowly

awakened from the Matrix narcolepsy and found an inverted

reality, what you thought was truth was a dream, and what you

have awakened to find is the true nightmare of an amoral

reality."

 

The knowledge you and others are attempting to impart here is

massively important and I believe your Escaping the Matrix is

the key to this.

 

With regard to practical aspects of spreading this

information, I recently wrote a letter to a Scottish newspaper

with daily circulation of  aprox 200,000.  I  condemned  the

Iraq war and US imperialism and quoted from your work.  I

strongly urged reader to google and read Escaping The Matrix.  In response to that letter, I have been invited to submit an

essay to an on-line magazine which takes up to 850,000 hits. As a result of one letter,  information on your work will have been disseminated to potentially a million people. Perhaps others might consider consider the possibilities here.

 

kind regards

 

jim

 

--------

 

Dear Jim,

 

Welcome to our community dialog! Very nice to receive your

comments.

 

As I read over the Matrix article, I find that the main theme

works well, but much of the material is dated, particularly

since 9/11. What I'm doing is weaving in the parts of the

article that still apply with the later material in my

original Part I of the new book. I think this will turn out to

be effective. I should have a new draft of the book ready for

posting very soon.

 

stay in touch,

rkm

 

--------------------------------------------------------

From: Carolyn Baker

To: cj-at-cyberjournal.org

Subject: Re: FYI: recent newslog postings

Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:34:08 -0700

 

Richard:

 

Please see my latest article: MANUFACTURING DISSENT: HOW THE

PROGRESSIVES GAVE THE ELECTION TO BUSH AT:

http://www.globalresearch.ca

 

Thank you.

Carolyn Baker

 

------------

 

Dear Carolyn,

 

Great article! I Posted it to newslog.

 

I post a lot to newslog, which is intended primarily as an

archive to be viewed on the web. But 53 people have actually

subscribed. I recommend that people go there once a week or so

to look for items of interest. I post there the best of the

hundreds of articles I receive every week from various

sources.

 

rkm

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:19:28 +0700

From: "Dave Patterson" To: renaissance-network-at-cyberjournal.org

Subject: organise!

 

Hi Richard - following your postings and new book with

interest, as always  - don't have much to say otherwise about

it, and I expect "great stuff!"  is not exactly what you are

looking for in terms of commentary, so I  haven't. But I

received your most recent as I was finishing a letter for a group that may overlap your mailing list, and thought I would

send it  along for you to have a look at, and perhaps do me a

small favor. I agree  with most of what you say and think, but

have not yet come to believe that  we must just turn our backs

on politics and the current system because of its deep

corruption - I cannot think of any other practical way to organise our complex, modern societies, with so many people,

not only in  each country but in the world. I do indeed

believe that it is not the  system that is at fault, but that

we have allowed it to be taken over by  some very bad people -

I think an advanced parliamentary-type system (in  theory! -

not the current corporate-controlled and corrupt

manifestations  thereof!) is probably as good as it gets, at

least until the large  majority of "We the People" are

intelligent and mature enough to get along  cooperatively -

which I see as being quite a long ways down the road, from looking around the world today. We need, in my opinion, a good

government  to protect We the People from well-organised and

powerful corporate or  other marauders - that they have taken

over the means we should be using  to control them does not

invalidate those means, it just means we need to  regain

control and be a bit more careful in the future about guarding

our  interests.

 

In any event, you're busy and I won't go on - but what I

thought was, if  you had a few on the list in Canada, perhaps

you could send this out for their perusal? (There's an

easier-to-read version on my website at http://www.rudemacedon.ca/fhtt-letters/1113-organise.html

Dave Patterson

 

----------

 

Dear Dave,

 

Thanks for your comments.

 

I must say I am somewhat mystified when people say "great

stuff!" but then disagree with the main points I've been

trying to put across. Life will always remain a mystery I

suppose.

 

Why do you think that a parliamentary system is the best in

theory when no parliamentary system in history has been

anything but a mechanism for elite rule? And why do people

think it has been 'taken over' when it was run by elites from

the very beginning, and designed by elites in the first place?

My mind boggles.

 

I agree that finding an alternative is a more problematic

issue. But why do you say you "cannot think of any other

practical way" when all of my chapters on harmonization have

been trying to describe such a way?  Perhaps you have reasons

why you think those ideas are faulty. If so I'd very much like

to hear those reasons... either I'll learn from them, or I can

try to address them in the material.

 

I don't mean to dis your contribution by the way, I appreciate

it. But it does raise these questions in my head.

 

best regards,

rkm

 

 

--

======================If you find this material useful, you might want to check out our website

(http://cyberjournal.org) or try out our low-traffic, moderated email list by sending a message to:

      cj-subscribe-at-cyberjournal.org

 

You are encouraged to forward any material from the lists or the website,

provided it is for non-commercial use and you include the source and

this disclaimer.

 

Richard Moore (rkm)

Wexford, Ireland

 

"Global Transformation: Whey We Need It And How We Can Achieve It", current draft:

    http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/rkmGlblTrans.html

_____________________________

    "...the Patriot Act followed 9-11 as smoothly as the

      suspension of the Weimar constitution followed the

      Reichstag fire."        - Srdja Trifkovic

 

    There is not a problem with the system.

    The system is the problem.

 

    Faith in ourselves - not gods, ideologies, leaders, or programs.

_____________________________

"Zen of Global Transformation" home page:     http://www.QuayLargo.com/Transformation/

 

QuayLargo discussion forum:

    http://www.QuayLargo.com/Transformation/ShowChat/?ScreenName=ShowThreads

 

cj list archives:

    http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=cj

 

newslog list archives:

    http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=newslog

_____________________________

Informative links:

    http://www.indymedia.org/

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/

    http://www.MiddleEast.org

    http://www.rachel.org

    http://www.truthout.org

    http://www.williambowles.info/monthly_index/

    http://www.zmag.org

    http://www.co-intelligence.org

======================


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

We recommend that you follow URLs to original sources, to view articles in their original format and context.